Hi Martins,
----- Original Message -----
> Nathan,
> Yes that would be great to get it in the tree. We are very interested in
> these metrics and would look at getting it up and running.
>
OK, its merged now and disabled from packaging pending your review,
updating, testing & so on. Good luck, and have fun!
> > There have been several advances since that post too - the perl API
> > grew support for the pmdaCache routines that Max talks about there.
> >
> > Also, python became an option for PMDAs in the interim - if someone
> > is keen to pick up those review comments and hack on this further,
> > might be worth considering that aspect too (python, too, can use the
> > pmdaCache APIs). An automated test to exercise the logic would be
> > a welcome addition as well (e.g. qa/553 "Exercise the gluster PMDA"
> > would make a good reference there).
> >
> > So, you guide me - would it be helpful in the tree and not packaged
> > as Max suggested?
> >
cheers.
--
Nathan
|