Re: [pcp] pcp updates: packaging

[Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Mark,

----- Original Message -----
> On 01/09/2014 12:46 PM, Nathan Scott wrote:
> >      Another tilt at the NeedRebuild saga - this is a temp flag file, which
> >      will be removed, as such it should not be in the RPM package filelist.
> 
> just a nit: should it still be present but prefixed with a %ghost directive?

I don't really know - what advantages would that give?  Just these two... ?

> e.g. so rpm -e will correctly erase it? (and to keep rpmlint happy too).

We can remove it in the %preun ourselves - Frank mentioned this too, and this
is now in place - tho manually done, *shrug*.  rpmlint doesn't know about the
file at all, so I'd think it wouldn't complain.

I don't have a preference really, just keen to stop the stream of niggly rpm
install complaints that come in ... feel free to tackle it different/better!

cheers.

--
Nathan