pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] recent regressions ...

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] recent regressions ...
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:42:51 +1000
Cc: PCP Mailing List <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1134392531.2073226.1374712320585.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <51F06E3C.6010604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1134392531.2073226.1374712320585.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7
On 25/07/13 10:32, Nathan Scott wrote:

That's a new one - is that in the sample.log or output from Install?
I honestly have no idea where that might be coming from - there's no
messages anything like that in libpcp, libpcp_pmda, nor pmcd AFAIK.

Hmm wonder where this came from, and why it has never bitten before ...

$ which pmpost
/usr/bin/pmpost
$ ls -l /usr/bin/pmpost
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 469660 Nov 20  2012 /usr/bin/pmpost

$ ls -l /usr/lib/pcp/bin/pmpost
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 9732 Jul 25 10:19 /usr/lib/pcp/bin/pmpost

Removing the bogus one and problem solved.

Thanks.

Once in a blue moon I am also seeing a pmcd core, but have no test
case reproducer atm ... still hunting that down.  If its reproducible
at all, please lemme know the recipe - thanks!

OK, I'll keep and eye out for it.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>