pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pmlogger performance

To: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] pmlogger performance
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:50:40 +1000
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <51E4ADD0.6060806@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <51E374C4.5@xxxxxxxxxx> <51E4A12C.5000003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <51E4A7DE.1090307@xxxxxxxxxx> <51E4A93F.4070505@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <51E4ADD0.6060806@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7
On 16/07/13 12:20, Stan Cox wrote:
On 07/15/2013 10:00 PM, Ken McDonell wrote:
If the benchmark was using 80% of the available CPU cycles

Have a recommendation for a worthy benchmark?  Perhaps mysql or postgres?

If I am understanding the experiment correctly, the benchmark does not really matter ... you just want something to generate some background load.

Simple is probably best IMHO.

I'd suggest sysbench run with the attached script I hacked up ... it makes my 6 CPU machine 80% cpu busy and smacks the disks.

Have fun.

Attachment: run.sysbench
Description: Text document

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>