| To: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Bug#715104: Broken library symlink detected in libpcp-trace2-dev |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 06 Jul 2013 16:27:34 +1000 |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <51D7B731.1070101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <51d7aa09.0366b60a.1c61.ffffbce1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <51D7B731.1070101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
[I did send my reply to David also]
Just for the PCP folks, I've noticed that libpcp is packaged the same way but
not on David's list.
In the control file, libpcp3-dev has this
Package: libpcp3-dev
Section: libdevel
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libpcp3 (= ${binary:Version}), libc6-dev | libc-dev
while libpcp-gui2-dev has this
Package: libpcp-gui2-dev
Section: libdevel
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libpcp3 (= ${binary:Version})
- note there seems to be a missing ", libpcp-gui2 (= ${binary:Version})" on the
Depends line.
Could some debian packaging wizard chime in here please?
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Bug#715104: Broken library symlink detected in libpcp-trace2-dev, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Bug#715104: Re: [pcp] Bug#715104: Broken library symlink detected in libpcp-trace2-dev, Dave Steele |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Bug#715104: Broken library symlink detected in libpcp-trace2-dev, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Bug#715104: Re: [pcp] Bug#715104: Broken library symlink detected in libpcp-trace2-dev, Dave Steele |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |