| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stan Cox <scox@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Failing python tests on RHEL6 (was Re: [pcp] Issues with 3.8 on rhel 6 (minor) and sles 11 (not as minor) |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 15 May 2013 19:18:14 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5192CE1D.8030009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5192396A.3090600@xxxxxxx> <5192ABAD.80807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5192CE1D.8030009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | T4kACNsfgN1n1nZirfsf+Eh5hcrJjg== |
| Thread-topic: | Failing python tests on RHEL6 (was Re: [pcp] Issues with 3.8 on rhel 6 (minor) and sles 11 (not as minor) |
----- Original Message ----- > The failing tests are 709 and 722 which continue to be much more likely > to fail than pass in my QA environments. Could you fwd those bad files? I'm sitting pretty on 100% pass rate with RHEL6 over here, both with and without secure-sockets enabled. Stan and I did have to work through some host-dependencies on 722 just prior to the last release though, so perhaps there are still similar issues lurking. thanks. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Issues with 3.8 on rhel 6 (minor) and sles 11 (not as minor), Josh Stone |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] FC18 status, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Issues with 3.8 on rhel 6 (minor) and sles 11 (not as minor), Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Failing python tests on RHEL6 (was Re: [pcp] Issues with 3.8 on rhel 6 (minor) and sles 11 (not as minor), Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |