pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pylint cleanup

To: Stan Cox <scox@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pylint cleanup
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:17:12 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1804300927.3038166.1366783935325.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <960785872.3037831.1366783742570.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <1804300927.3038166.1366783935325.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: xA8xK7SbKr7n5LRuQeNsW0dWzfhBGTS+QGK+d+fQqp0=
Thread-topic: pylint cleanup

----- Original Message -----
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Hey Stan,
> > 
> > Noticed the disabling of "method could be a function" in that recent
> 
> Also, 'nuther suggestion: regarding the rename of class "cpu" -> "Cpu",
> perhaps "Processor" might be a better option? (the other subsystems are
> not acronyms, and "Cpu" stood out to my casual-observer-eye a bit).
> 

Ah, complete list was in the git commit too...

        * pmsubsys.py (_pmsubsys): Rename: cpu->Cpu, interrupt->Interrupt,
        disk->Disk, memory->Memory, net->Net, proc->Proc, subsys->Subsys

Other random "reads-better-to-me" suggestions would include: "Network",
"Process" and perhaps even "SubSystem" (but perhaps not given the module
name is pmsubsys) ... all just suggestions, pick your own preferences of
course.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>