| To: | Stan Cox <scox@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pylint cleanup |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:12:15 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <960785872.3037831.1366783742570.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <960785872.3037831.1366783742570.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | xA8xK7SbKr7n5LRuQeNsW0dWzfhBGTS+QGK+ |
| Thread-topic: | pylint cleanup |
----- Original Message ----- > Hey Stan, > > Noticed the disabling of "method could be a function" in that recent Also, 'nuther suggestion: regarding the rename of class "cpu" -> "Cpu", perhaps "Processor" might be a better option? (the other subsystems are not acronyms, and "Cpu" stood out to my casual-observer-eye a bit). cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | pylint cleanup, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates: scox merge, sasl, qa, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | pylint cleanup, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pylint cleanup, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |