pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] python QA/709 failures

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stan Cox <scox@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] python QA/709 failures
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 23:02:37 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: PCP Mailing List <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5167C37D.7040406@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1086370001.24034377.1364166803775.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <514F89FC.5020102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <515DC99F.6050600@xxxxxxxxxx> <5167C37D.7040406@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: fnFpJ3HeFCunUyRu3g+xE/FKdQiV+w==
Thread-topic: python QA/709 failures

----- Original Message -----
> On 05/04/13 05:42, Stan Cox wrote:
> > On 03/24/2013 07:19 PM, Ken McDonell wrote:
> ...
> tree, especially if there are python changes beyond the qa ones.  What's
> the plan for getting your changes merged into the official pcp tree on
> oss.sgi.com?
> 

I'm looking into that - they have been merged into my private tree for
a few days, just sorting out a few remaining issues and doing additional
QA.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>