pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: pcp python package/namespace experimentation

To: Stan Cox <scox@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: pcp python package/namespace experimentation
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 17:55:23 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Michael Werner <mtw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5158FD2F.7060200@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <2051621914.24702083.1364259415198.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <5158FD2F.7060200@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: pSmX6ohfWunoJb36TXpqL+ifRvjYOw==
Thread-topic: pcp python package/namespace experimentation

----- Original Message -----
> On 03/25/2013 08:56 PM, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > I also came across pcpi.py
> 
> There was an example that I still have saved away that worked with the
> original bindings.  The current upstream bindings allow vector inputs
> for the primary routines, so it is a bit easier to use the raw calls now
> I think.  Except for pmExtractValue which is still only one value fetch
> ...
> Unfortunately pcpi.py currently doesn't work due to the above changes.
> I am looking at getting it working again.
> 

Ah - if its to do with the namespace/module changes of mine (almost certainly
is!), feel free to send it through and I'll fix it up & make a test from it.

thanks Stan!

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: pcp python package/namespace experimentation, Nathan Scott <=