pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:14:26 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1235909676.25249712.1364335425307.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>

----- Original Message -----
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > With these changes my QA failures on Gentoo are down from 70+ to 7.
> > 
> > I'd really appreciate some feedback on the ipv6 run-time check
> > changes in libpcp ... they are a bit hacky, but I cannot see an
> > obviously cleaner way to fix it.
> 
> Thanks Ken, looking good.  I think the seeming hackiness comes from
> the way we're adapting what was a static-only config setup to need a
> dynamic test.  If we make the dynamic testing more integral (I guess
> more cases like this ipv6 test will arrive down the track), then it
> might come together more cleanly - I'll have a crack at this today.
> 

1cf03e792b in my personal tree has a possible alternative, which I
think is a little more future-proof and clean.  I'll start pushing
the contents of that tree over to the main tree dev branch soon, I
just need to stabilise some of my python churn further first.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>