pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Build/install status for 3.7.0

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Build/install status for 3.7.0
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:44:56 +1100
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1198532005.15945263.1362605295516.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1198532005.15945263.1362605295516.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3

I have a Windows 8 VM there with a pre-release developer licence
(that
may or may not still work), but the biggest obstacle is there is no
reliable recipe for creating a build environment with MSYS et al to
create installable packages.

In the interim, to catch dev branch build fallout early on (before a
release), could a git-based (update/clone + build + raw make install)
kind of model be utilised?  (horrible, I know)


git is not the problem.

The issue is I have no clue what pieces of MinGW/MSYS need to be installed where and in what order to get an "official" or even "sane" build environment.

I have something on _another_ Windows box that sort of works but the build takes many hours. If I'm going to do this I need a "create the Windows build environment" recipe so I have something that is at least reproducible ... but that recipe does not seem to exist anywhere.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>