http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=936
Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--- Comment #2 from Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-12-09 03:30:23
CST ---
First I think this is already fixed for rising, but not for falling (don't
ask!) in my top of tree pmie (I fixed a couple of %i %v binding botches a
couple of weeks ago).
Second, a new QA test (515 ... coming soon), show something very similar to the
problem show here works as expected for the rising case and shows the failure
for the falling case.
Thirdly, the predicate proposed is OK ... the semantics of rising and falling
follow the analogue of a logic analyzer where the trigger (or alarm) is in the
rising (or falling) edge of the predicate going from false to true (or true to
false)
--
Configure bugmail: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
|