pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Makepkgs fallout

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Makepkgs fallout
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:58:14 +1100
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1728227655.34005625.1353972837144.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1728227655.34005625.1353972837144.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 18:33 -0500, Nathan Scott wrote:
> BTW, I've reverted this change for now - we think it may be the
> cause of some confusing test results here.  There's also some
> evidence that running tests from in a workarea (ie below qa/)
> is using pcp.conf from the build rather than the root.  Which
> seems odd & unexpected to me, but I havent found the source of
> that yet.

I don't see how the Makepkgs change can be breaking things for QA.

I do think we have a big problem associated with moving QA into the PCP
tree, namely that we descend into qa and qa/src _both_ in the build and
when running QA from a workarea (the latter being a non-negotiable
requirement IMHO for on-going QA maintenance and development).

In one case (the build) you _want_ to use include files and pcp.conf
from ../src/include ... in the other case (running QA) you _want_ to use
the installed versions of the include files and pcp.conf (from a
packages build).

Seems like we need to back QA out the PCP tree _or_ find some clever way
of making the makefiles schizophrenic.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>