FYI - I'm seeing this qa issue, I guess as a result of these
commits...
----- Original Message -----
>
> commit 8473e700053f04fb72b083cfb12f38246dd60160
> Author: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri Nov 23 21:19:43 2012 +1100
>
> pmie - %h/%v/%i tweaks, -d fixes
>
> Update the man page to be more precise about how the bindings for
> %h, %v and %i are made in rules.
>
> Some cosmetic code changes to improve comments.
>
> Several fixups for -d (debug mode) where the code was just wrong
> and had regressed as changes had been made over the years in
> other
> parts of pmie.
>
> [this is an interim commit, I expect there will be more to come]
>
> commit 4bb4f65cf5a277b0c2242748648a993a036482d3
> Author: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri Nov 23 21:17:42 2012 +1100
>
> qa/514 - new - exercise pmie -d
>
> As part of the validation of the %h, %i and %v selectors in pmie
> rules.
>
[85%] 514 - output mismatch (see 514.out.bad)
798a799
> DATE: (null)
802a804
> DATE: (null)
806a809
> DATE: (null)
810a814
> DATE: (null)
814a819
> DATE: (null)
840c845
< min_inst sample.part.bin :LOCALHOST
---
> min_inst sample_part.bin :LOCALHOST
cheers.
--
Nathan
|