pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] dev branch configure/build on rhel4 (old autoconf)

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] dev branch configure/build on rhel4 (old autoconf)
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 07:56:47 -0400
Cc: pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAAp5ZgNuTCXnp3JDu5jsY3o59r2JZ55B_hWy83WHmEtmbBVTRA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20120723124719.GF6331@xxxxxxxxxx> <CAAp5ZgNuTCXnp3JDu5jsY3o59r2JZ55B_hWy83WHmEtmbBVTRA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Hi, Nathan -

nathans wrote:
> [...]
> At this stage for 3.5.5 I'm looking for something simple, and would
> prefer to pull in those changes (gcc/ld options) if we can.
> Reworking configure this way may well be a good thing (it'd simplify
> windows builds too, as I recall fighting autoconf there as well)
> ... but a bit risky for a small bugfix release.

(Technically, my proposed change would consist of nothing other than
including a generated ./configure file in git, and removing direct
invocations of autoconf from the few places it is mentioned.  Not
risky really, due to autoconf's compatibility.)


> Since AIUI this change is checking whether gcc supports some new
> flags we might be able to achieve the same more simply by either
> avoiding the use of cflags [...]  If its all too problematic, we can
> pull that change from 3.6.5 [...]

If necessary ... but actually using old autoconf, and adding
    .../configure --without-ssp --without-pie
makes the status quo work on rhel4 also.

> Don't get too hung up on other RHEL4 fixes though - check with Mark, but
> I think he stopped building there awhile ago for other reasons (?)  - I might
> be misremembering that.

(RHEL4 has reached end-of-supported-life not too long ago.)


- FChE

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>