| To: | "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] RFC: invocation of revised configure/make system |
| From: | Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:54:35 +1000 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120420030651.GC18822@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20120419204235.GA18822@xxxxxxxxxx> <1334886837.5884.12.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120420030651.GC18822@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 |
On 04/20/2012 01:06 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: Hi -No objections from me ... sounds promising, so please drill down on how this would work.The actual changes should be pretty small. Some snippets of the existing configure.in (computing pcp_lib_dir and siblings) would be moved into Makepkgs, and replaced in configure.in by something like pcp_lib_dir=$libdir pcp_tmp_dir=$localstatedir/tmp pcp_run_dir=$localstatedir/run pcp_doc_dir=$docdir For an RPM spec+tarball driven build that does not use Makepkgs I guess we'd have to compute pcp_lib_dir and siblings in the %prep section, prior to calling %configure .. right? FYI the current Fedora PCP spec is at: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/rpm/3.6.1-1/pcp.spec (note it does not currently use %configure), and the src tarball is ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/rpm/3.6.1-1/pcp-3.6.1-1.src.tar.gz Regards -- Mark |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] RFC: invocation of revised configure/make system, Frank Ch. Eigler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] RFC: invocation of revised configure/make system, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] RFC: invocation of revised configure/make system, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] RFC: invocation of revised configure/make system, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |