| To: | Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] fibre adapter counters in pcp? |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 Apr 2012 05:55:51 +1000 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx, Robert verkerk <robert.verkerk@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4F8EC241.6070407@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
[Dropped ds-tg from CC as it appears mails there are not getting through?]
Yeah, I'd vote for the separate PMDA approach still, because a/ most people don't need this stuff so for them its just bloat and b/ it looks like it could blow out with different vendors needing different metrics/logic. Its not a problem to create a new separate, optional DSO PMDA for these kind of stats. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] fibre adapter counters in pcp?, Mark Goodwin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RFC: invocation of revised configure/make system, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] fibre adapter counters in pcp?, Mark Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] fibre adapter counters in pcp?, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |