| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:53:25 +1100 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1793700059.46983.1326419918854.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
----- Original Message ----- > Attached is a text version of the html, with FIXED/IGNORED annotations > in the final column for the ones I've looked at. > > I've found one subtle case where fixing something broke something (see > commit e57f80da1619431343b596611cae38d599832cd1), so I'd appreciate an > eye being cast over all these changes too - sometimes its immediately er, *not* immediately obvious, I mean. :) > obvious what the best fix approach is, so any feedback would be good. cheers. -- Nathan |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Propiedades Destacadas de Enero, La Capitana 13 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans, Mark Goodwin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |