| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:58:38 +1100 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <258201772.46774.1326413265675.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Attached is a text version of the html, with FIXED/IGNORED annotations in the final column for the ones I've looked at. I've found one subtle case where fixing something broke something (see commit e57f80da1619431343b596611cae38d599832cd1), so I'd appreciate an eye being cast over all these changes too - sometimes its immediately obvious what the best fix approach is, so any feedback would be good. cheers. -- Nathan
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans, Mark Goodwin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans, Mark Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
