pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] [PATCH 0/6] nfsclient pmda

To: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] [PATCH 0/6] nfsclient pmda
From: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:44:43 +1100
In-reply-to: <20126.20788.358508.420437@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20125.26224.261450.109478@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1479445151.29631.1318965933845.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20126.20788.358508.420437@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/7.0
On 10/19/2011 03:25 PM, Max Matveev wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:25:33 +1100 (EST), Nathan Scott wrote:

  >>  PS. Nathan, what's the point of splitting stuff in src/cpan into a
  >>  separate package and at the same time shipping perl pmdas in the main
  >>  one?

  nathans>  It allows separation of build dependencies for layered
  nathans>  builds.  There's a logical hierarchy of libpcp/libpcp_pmda
  nathans>  ->  PCP::PMDA ->  pcp and anyone building their own PMDAs
  nathans>  outside of PCP doesn't need to install pcp for their builds.

When we need a prereq from pcp for perl-PCP-PMDA - without it
perly pmdas are useless. Or all perlies must go to a separate package
which will prereq perl-PCP-PMDA.

or perly PMDAs could ship in perl-PCP-PMDA itself instead of pcp.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>