pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:52:51 +1100
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1317813095.8365.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1317813095.8365.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: ndsco1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Ken,

On 5 October 2011 22:11, Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is it for pmlogrewrite for the first time around.


Awesome!
 
pmlogrewrite was hatched over pizza and beers, after a couple of years
of underground gestation ... it was supposed to be a "small" project,
but did not quite pan out the way ... compared to other PCP components,
pmlogrewrite:

- 22% more lines of flex source than the nearest contender (dbpmda)
- 41% more lines of bison source than the nearest contender (pmie)
- only pmie and pmcd have more words in their man pages
- 1,300+ lines of QA shell scripts
- 12,300+ lines of qualified QA output


... and a bit scary.  :)
 
Just as well I'm retired ... 8^)>

ps if we want to do it, handling the linux pmda split for proc metrics
really _does_ work


Yes, I think we should tackle this in a future release.  Speaking of which, hoping to get back to 3.5.9 later this week / early next, as some other deadlines pass ... will pull this set in.

cheers.

--
Nathan
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>