pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates
From: Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 20:54:56 +1000
Cc: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <637103356.128640.1309735949444.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1309485379.14182.43.camel@bozo> <637103356.128640.1309735949444.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 09:32:29 +1000 (EST), Nathan Scott wrote:

 nathans> Strange - does cpp silently ignore a define if it maps to the same
 nathans> value, perhaps?  (both domain.h and stdpmid map "LOGGER" to 106).

Always did. Some older ones didn't even complain if something has been
re-defined.

max

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>