Re: [pcp] Planning for PCP 4.0

[Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>]

----- "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Seems reasonable and in the spirit of the other version retirement
> changes.
> 
> I'm guessing this means pmnscomp-only change to generate v2 pmns by
> default.

*nod*

>  Do you want to remove the ability to _write_ anything other
> than a v2 pmns from pmnscomp?  I'll need to retain the ability to read
> a v1 or v2 pmns.
> 
> I suspect v0 pmns can be 100% poxed off, thoughts?

Yep.  Looks like theres a bit of code savings to be made there, losing
v0, but v1 and v2 are relatively close so I'd suggest keeping both.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan