----- "Max Matveev" <makc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ideally it would be nice to have QtAssistant as "dependent" package
> on
> Darwin but this is not how trolls ship it, so I'm going to push
> QtAssistant into pcp-gui package.
OK, sounds good.
>
> nathans> I think we should try to keep compilation here (for now,
> anyway)
> nathans> but I'm OK with no online help for those few users.
>
> So, should I remove pcpdoc.adp? If I'm going to keep it then I'll try
Yes, that would be fine IMO.
> to make the "right" thing and detect the version of Qt I'm using and
> compile the right format depending on the version.
Well, could do that too, the configure script already has logic for
figuring out the Qt version ... up to you.
> nathans> I think it was 4.6 that introduced this (it was 4.6 that
> supported
> nathans> Snow Leapord anyway, which AIUI is 64 bit only? This was
> the point
> nathans> at which all hell broke loose here anyway, and people who
> upgraded
> nathans> their Macs to Snow Leopard had now pcp-gui for some time...
> :( I'm
> nathans> assuming this was all 64 bit fallout, and 4.6 seemed to fix
> that).
>
> Does not look this way - I've got 2010.01 Qt SDK which is
> 4.6.something and it only has i386 version. Also all the binaries in
> pcp-gui-1.5.0-x86_64 package are i386, so it's not 64 bit which was
> the issue but some other changes in the interface.
Hmm, OK.
> nathans> Right - the x86_64 dmg file on oss is compiled on Snow
> Leopard, the
> nathans> i386 dmg is compiled on 10.4 (IIRC), 32 bit.
>
> Are you using the same 4.6 SDK on both?
No, 4.6 only for (what I thought was) the 64 bit build (Snow Leopard).
Pretty sure I'm using an older Qt in the other build, whatever is on
my home machine (not sure off the top of my head actually).
cheers.
--
Nathan
|