| To: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Redhat spec file oddity? |
| From: | Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 09 Jul 2010 07:29:58 +1000 |
| In-reply-to: | <4C351868.2070401@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1423544260.699871278531754320.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C351868.2070401@xxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-2.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.4 |
On 07/08/2010 10:14 AM, Mark Goodwin wrote: Looks like the perl man pages have somehow ended up in pcp-libs-devel and also in the perl-PCP-* packages :
This simple patch fixes it :
diff --git a/build/rpm/pcp_fedora.spec b/build/rpm/pcp_fedora.spec
index f3f43cd..f755751 100644
--- a/build/rpm/pcp_fedora.spec
+++ b/build/rpm/pcp_fedora.spec
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ fi
%{_libdir}/libpcp_pmda.so.2
%{_libdir}/libpcp_trace.so
%{_includedir}/pcp/*.h
-%{_mandir}/man3/*
+%{_mandir}/man3/*.3.gz
%{_datadir}/pcp/demos
%{_datadir}/pcp/examples
However, that assumes the perl::PCP::* man pages should ship
with the perl packages rather than in pcp-libs-devel. Since
they get installed in man3, you could argue they belong in
the -devel package. Comments?
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] PCP question ... leading to pmimport discussion, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] PCP question ... leading to pmimport discussion, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Redhat spec file oddity?, Mark Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Redhat spec file oddity?, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |