| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] PCP question ... leading to pmimport discussion |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:30:23 +1000 |
| Cc: | pmatousu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1827442048.716351278550436048.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1827442048.716351278550436048.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 10:53 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > ... > XML is OK by me, only issue is wrt implementation - will we need to > pull in an external library? (and is it available on all platforms > we need it on, etc?) I'm guessing this would suffice in terms of general availability ... http://search.cpan.org/~grantm/XML-Simple-2.18/lib/XML/Simple.pm I've been able to parse a simple metric and indom specification using this and all the hard work of parsing is hidden while the resulting data structure seems OK in terms of making the pmi* calls I need. |
| Previous by Date: | pcp updates, nathans |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Redhat spec file oddity?, Mark Goodwin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] PCP question ... leading to pmimport discussion, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] PCP question ... leading to pmimport discussion, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |