| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pmlogconf |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:21:25 +1000 |
| Cc: | mgoodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <297824517.188211276212715310.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <297824517.188211276212715310.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
OK ... one thing at a time ... 8^)> Blokes of my age have zero multi-tasking skills, so I'm locked into pmlogconf for the moment. On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 09:31 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > ----- "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Yes, I think so. Possibly/probably/optionally using pmloggers > > existing control file mechanism? > > ... > > Oh, one other thing - pmie/pmieconf could probably be extended to > use a similar model (for remote hosts & probing) ... its a bit > closer, in that its integrated into the startup script (IIRC) but > not really geared to multiple host & "dynamic" (iow, new rules on > the fly) monitoring. > > cheers. > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pmlogconf, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Last minute changes for Solaris, Max Matveev |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pmlogconf, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pmlogconf, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |