pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: pmlogconf

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: pmlogconf
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:21:25 +1000
Cc: mgoodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <297824517.188211276212715310.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <297824517.188211276212715310.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
OK ... one thing at a time ... 8^)>

Blokes of my age have zero multi-tasking skills, so I'm locked into
pmlogconf for the moment.

On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 09:31 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> ----- "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Yes, I think so.  Possibly/probably/optionally using pmloggers
> > existing control file mechanism?
> > ...
> 
> Oh, one other thing - pmie/pmieconf could probably be extended to
> use a similar model (for remote hosts & probing) ... its a bit
> closer, in that its integrated into the startup script (IIRC) but
> not really geared to multiple host & "dynamic" (iow, new rules on
> the fly) monitoring.
> 
> cheers.
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>