pcp
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [pcp] Should PCP ship install-sh?

from [Ken McDonell] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Should PCP ship install-sh?
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 13:49:31 +1000
Cc: Scott Emery <emery@xxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <2069806970.15421275264626434.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <2069806970.15421275264626434.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 
I agree.

On 31/05/2010 10:10 AM, Nathan Scott wrote:

Hi Scott,

----- "Scott Emery"<emery@xxxxxxx>  wrote:


        I propose that install-sh be installed in $(PCP_BINADM_DIR) and
the installed builddefs define INSTALL=$(PCP_BINDADM_DIR)/install-sh.



I think that's a good idea.  Anyone have any objections?

cheers.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [pcp] Uninstalling pcpglider, Nathan Scott
Next by Date:  pcp updates, Nathan Scott
Previous by Thread:  Re: [pcp] Should PCP ship install-sh?, Nathan Scott
Next by Thread:  Re: [pcp] Should PCP ship install-sh?, Martin Hicks
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]