| To: | kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Culling code from libpcp |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 May 2010 07:32:22 +1000 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1273092461.22330.67.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
----- "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Based on responses from Max and Greg, it seems that making these > routines go away is not going to happen. *nod* > I can certainly expand my gcov analysis to look for larger chunks of > functionality that are untested by the current QA suite. Sounds good! cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Culling code from libpcp, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Culling code from libpcp, Greg Banks |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Culling code from libpcp, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Culling code from libpcp, Greg Banks |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |