[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Culling code from libpcp

To: kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] Culling code from libpcp
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 09:40:21 +1000 (EST)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1273009170.22330.53.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
----- "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm suggesting that we remove all the asynchronous PMAPI extensions
> from libpcp as part of a PCP 4.0 goal.
> ...
> 5. there is zero QA coverage for the asynchronous routines (I was
> recently doing some gcov analysis in pmns.c which brings this issue
> into stark relief and triggered this mail).

Sounds good to me.  I wonder if there's any other completely unused
routines too (maybe the QA gcov would help find those too?  or at
least be a starting point for making a list).



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>