Re: [pcp] Culling code from libpcp

[Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>]

----- "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm suggesting that we remove all the asynchronous PMAPI extensions
> from libpcp as part of a PCP 4.0 goal.
> ...
> 5. there is zero QA coverage for the asynchronous routines (I was
> recently doing some gcov analysis in pmns.c which brings this issue
> into stark relief and triggered this mail).

Sounds good to me.  I wonder if there's any other completely unused
routines too (maybe the QA gcov would help find those too?  or at
least be a starting point for making a list).

cheers.

-- 
Nathan