| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Local context vs dynamic namespace |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:44:07 +1000 |
| Cc: | pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1419860990.620491271201038915.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1419860990.620491271201038915.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 09:23 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > ... > This all means you have to parse pmcd.conf in libpcp, which is a bit > more involved perhaps than walking a directory and using the existing > (-K) parser code ... but, you choose, I'd be happy with either way. The parsing is pretty simple ... I opted to not do a heap of error checking because (a) pmcd is already doing that at the time pmcd.conf is updated and reread, and (b) the parsing happens during the first call to pmNewContext(PM_CONTEXT_LOCAL, NULL) or pmLocalPMDA(...) or pmSpecLocalPMDA() and this is a bad place to be trying to return "helpful" parser error messages. I can revisit this if someone sees a problem with the approach I've taken. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Local context vs dynamic namespace, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Local context vs dynamic namespace, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Local context vs dynamic namespace, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Local context vs dynamic namespace, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |