pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] PMID domain number for new pmda

To: Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] PMID domain number for new pmda
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:43:27 +1100
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <19372.1314.39706.68697@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <19372.1314.39706.68697@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I think the number of PMDA developers is still sufficiently small ...
8^)> ... so we don't need a heavy protocol, and I'd suggest submitting a
patch to the list and it shall be so.

On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 11:51 +1100, Max Matveev wrote:
> We're developing IPMI pmda internally which may or may not ever see
> the light of the open-source world. I'd like to use an officially
> assigned domain number to avoid archive problems in the future. What's
> the protocol for getting a domain for not-yet-ready pmdas?
> 
> Martin, IIRC SGI has had plans to write IPMI pmda in the past. Do you
> know if something has happen in this area?
> 
> max
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pcp mailing list
> pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/pcp


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>