pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Regression for handling of ipc_prot=notready

To: kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] Regression for handling of ipc_prot=notready
From: Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 19:29:02 +1100
Cc: Martin Hicks <mort@xxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1257540818.2905.18.camel@localhost>
References: <20091106164605.GH11632@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1257540818.2905.18.camel@localhost>
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:53:38 +1100, Ken McDonell wrote:

 kenj> I'm not sure when this bit of "notready" fluff got added to pmcd's
 kenj> config file (the pmcd<->PMDA protocol support has been there for a long
 kenj> time, since the first Oracle PMDA was written).
It was added at the same time then async support was added - we simply
could not find a better way to deal with races between HUTA pmda
starting up and pmcd wanting to talk to it.

 kenj> However from reading the code, it looks like for a PMDA connected via a
 kenj> pipe, the supported protocols in the pmcd config file are "binary" or
 kenj> "binary notready".
This is correct.

max

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>