| To: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] [resend] Derived Metrics - RFC |
| From: | Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 6 Nov 2009 00:15:56 +1100 |
| Cc: | kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <2126406291.235831257392194606.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1257384538.4706.76.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2126406291.235831257392194606.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:36:34 +1100 (EST), Nathan Scott wrote: >> 2. Only guaranteed to work for the synchronous PMAPI variants. >> So for example I'll make pmLookupName() work, but invest no >> effort in the asynchronous pair pmRequestNames() and pmReceiveNames(). >> As an aside does any know of a living user of these asynchronous >> interface extensions to the original PMAPI? nscott> (Not that I know of... perhaps these can die. They are not nscott> implemented on Win32 & AFAICT cannot be, so I would rather nscott> noone started using them). What's the problem of implemeting them on Windows? No select/poll? max |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] [resend] Derived Metrics - RFC, Max Matveev |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] [resend] Derived Metrics - RFC, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] [resend] Derived Metrics - RFC, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] [resend] Derived Metrics - RFC, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |