pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] [resend] Derived Metrics - RFC

To: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] [resend] Derived Metrics - RFC
From: Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 00:15:56 +1100
Cc: kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <2126406291.235831257392194606.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1257384538.4706.76.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2126406291.235831257392194606.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:36:34 +1100 (EST), Nathan Scott wrote:

 >> 2. Only guaranteed to work for the synchronous PMAPI variants. 
 >> So for example I'll make pmLookupName() work, but invest no
 >> effort in the asynchronous pair pmRequestNames() and pmReceiveNames().
 >> As an aside does any know of a living user of these asynchronous
 >> interface extensions to the original PMAPI?

 nscott> (Not that I know of... perhaps these can die.  They are not
 nscott> implemented on Win32 & AFAICT cannot be, so I would rather
 nscott> noone started using them).
What's the problem of implemeting them on Windows? No select/poll?

max

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>