pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates

To: Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:25:38 +1100
Cc: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4ACE7C81.1090707@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <489404631.5291255040787305.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ACE7C81.1090707@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I agree.

On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 10:57 +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote:
> Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Are there any of these that you think are critical for 3.0 Max?
> > We have run a fair bit of QA on the current bits & deployed them
> > to quite a few test machines here, so unless there is something
> > pressing hiding in here, I'm thinking we should off for a 3.0.1
> > for these... is that OK?
> 
> Yes, I'd agree - this has come in during "phase-R". But let's
> hear from Max.
> 
> IMO we are ready to release 3.0. So merge 3.0.0-8 from dev to
> master and tag both branches. Any objections?
> 
> Then we can bump dev to 3.0.1-1 and pull in Max's changes and
> start a new QA cycle.
> 
> Cheers
> -- Mark
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pcp mailing list
> pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/pcp

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>