[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates

To: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates
From: Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:57:53 +1100
Cc: Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <489404631.5291255040787305.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <489404631.5291255040787305.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20090320)
Nathan Scott wrote:
Are there any of these that you think are critical for 3.0 Max?
We have run a fair bit of QA on the current bits & deployed them
to quite a few test machines here, so unless there is something
pressing hiding in here, I'm thinking we should off for a 3.0.1
for these... is that OK?

Yes, I'd agree - this has come in during "phase-R". But let's
hear from Max.

IMO we are ready to release 3.0. So merge 3.0.0-8 from dev to
master and tag both branches. Any objections?

Then we can bump dev to 3.0.1-1 and pull in Max's changes and
start a new QA cycle.

-- Mark

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>