| To: | "kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] MMV questions |
| From: | Max <makc@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:39:42 +1000 |
| Cc: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>, "pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1245049326.9070.2.camel@bozo> |
| References: | <765922600.6343411245025249624.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1245049326.9070.2.camel@bozo> |
On 15/06/2009, at 17:02, Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: As long as adding version 4 of pmda protocol is not going to result in premature dodoisation of the current pmdas it would be greatIn this context, is anyone interested in the extension I've been mullingover to make parts of the pmns truly dynamic, and avoiding the whole build a pmns file, merge into the global pmns and SIGHUP pmcd circus? max |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] MMV questions, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: MMV questions, Max Matveev |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] MMV questions, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] MMV questions, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |