----- "Mark Goodwin" <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Max Matveev wrote:
> >>>>>> "MG" == Mark Goodwin writes:
> > MG> yes that's correct. Looks like Fedora would only require that
> > MG> split pcp into pcp and pcp-devel (with pcp-debuginfo as a
> > Having pcp-libs will help with those pecky pcp killers installed in
> > the chroot jails: pcp-libs can be base for both pcp and pcp-devel,
> > development you don't need to install the the whole package.
> not sure how also splitting out pcp-libs would help. If you're doing
> development, you want the whole package no matter what, for QA reasons
> at least, right?
No, not for chroot builds - you would only want -libs and -devel.
Installing the main pcp package is the problem - it has the exitops
that take out a running pmcd on the build system... there's no good
reason to do that.