----- "Max Matveev" <makc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>> "MG" == Mark Goodwin writes:
>
> MG> yes that's correct. Looks like Fedora would only require that we
> MG> split pcp into pcp and pcp-devel (with pcp-debuginfo as a
> by-product).
>
> Having pcp-libs will help with those pecky pcp killers installed in
> the chroot jails: pcp-libs can be base for both pcp and pcp-devel,
> for
> development you don't need to install the the whole package.
Yes! And we can remove the /etc/init.d/pcp script hack to try to
work around that, then (the bit that figures out the path to the
running pmcd's logfile).
> BTW, Nathan, should newhelp be in a devel package?
Probably not, I guess, for the same reasons that build{defs,rules}
shouldnt be there either (needed by the runtime environment for
installing some PMDAs).
cheers.
--
Nathan
|