Re: pcp packaging split

[Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>]

>>>>> "MG" == Mark Goodwin writes:

 MG> yes that's correct. Looks like Fedora would only require that we
 MG> split pcp into pcp and pcp-devel (with pcp-debuginfo as a by-product).

Having pcp-libs will help with those pecky pcp killers installed in
the chroot jails: pcp-libs can be base for both pcp and pcp-devel, for
development you don't need to install the the whole package.

BTW, Nathan, should newhelp be in a devel package?

max