[Top] [All Lists]

Re: pcp packaging split

To: Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: pcp packaging split
From: Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 23:33:01 +1000
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4A11FF97.7010007@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <1602757131.5101411242688820054.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A11FF97.7010007@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> "MG" == Mark Goodwin writes:

 MG> yes that's correct. Looks like Fedora would only require that we
 MG> split pcp into pcp and pcp-devel (with pcp-debuginfo as a by-product).

Having pcp-libs will help with those pecky pcp killers installed in
the chroot jails: pcp-libs can be base for both pcp and pcp-devel, for
development you don't need to install the the whole package.

BTW, Nathan, should newhelp be in a devel package?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>