pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] PCP 2.8.0 released

To: Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] PCP 2.8.0 released
From: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:30:47 +1000 (EST)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <794358846.3316031239667629307.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
----- "Max Matveev" <makc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >>>>> "nscott" == Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>  nscott> I wonder if /etc/rc.d/init.d should ever be used?  Perhaps
> the order
>  nscott> of directories should be changed?  (else, we could just
> remove that
>  nscott> first directory - perhaps it was for IRIX?  Max do you
> remember?)
> 
> Definitely not Irix - IIRC it was done for either RH or SuSE. SuSE 10
> has etc/rc.d/init.d as symlink to /etc/init.d which sort of suggests
> that it was done for RH - ask markgw.

Redhat has /etc/init.d as a symlink to /etc/rc.d/init.d ... ho hum.
So, it looks like the configure thing is OK as is, perhaps, and we
need to take a closer look at Gregs system.

thanks.

-- 
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>