pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] PCP 2.8.0 released

To: Jeff Hanson <jhanson@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] PCP 2.8.0 released
From: Martin Hicks <mort@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 08:33:03 -0400
Cc: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <49DDE940.1010801@xxxxxxx>
References: <2127966388.3284191239277530932.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49DDE940.1010801@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 08:25:36AM -0400, Jeff Hanson wrote:
> Nathan Scott wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> PCP 2.8.0 is out there, in the git trees and now in binary/source
>> packages as well (tar, rpm, deb, dmg).  Enjoy!  A list of changes
>> and the download location is at http://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp .
>> The latest stable PCP GUI tree and images are in the same place.
>
> Just a note that
> rpm -Uv pcp-2.8.0-1.x86_64.rpm pcp-gui-1.3.5-1.x86_64.rpm 
> perl-PCP-LogSummary-1.01-8.noarch.rpm perl-PCP-PMDA-1.01-8.x86_64.rpm
> on a rhel 5.3 x86_64 system with sgi foundation software 1sp3 and propack 6sp3
> fails as pcp-2.8.0-1.x86_64 isn't replacing 
> pcp-open-noib-2.7.8-sgi603r1.x86_64
> and pcp-gui-1.3.5-1.x86_64 isn't replacing pcp-sgi-2.7.8-sgi603r1.x86_64
>
> Do we want this to work?  I can effort at the spec file if so desired.

I would call this "known".  SGI uses strange package names internally.

I think we shouldn't bother for the time being.  I plan to incorporate
pcp-2.8.0 into our development stream in the next development tree
(stout7).

I also don't think pcp-gui stricly replaces pcp-sgi:
  - some stuff moved from pcp to pcp-gui
  - there are still some closed-source stuff in pcp-sgi that we need to
    continue to ship.

mh

-- 
Martin Hicks || mort@xxxxxxxx || PGP/GnuPG: 0x4C7F2BEE

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>