[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions

To: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions
From: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:15:27 +1100
Cc: Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx, "edwardsg@xxxxxxx via BugWorks" <edwardsg@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1233915475.4556.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: SGI Engineering
References: <1233627045.5518.55.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <18825.23091.63084.898574@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1233742073.10265.1.camel@bozo> <1233786804.24330.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <498A6CD0.7010002@xxxxxxxxx> <18826.49390.974151.5980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1233876585.19028.19.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <18828.2923.770660.413637@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1233915475.4556.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: markgw@xxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20081209)

Nathan Scott wrote:
ps: Fedora10 has changed rpm options/syntax/configs/... &
the pcp/pcp-gui Makepkgs is b0rked - any interest in having
a look, Max?  You know this stuff better than anyone (Ken
said you'd _really_ want to take a look... ;)

actually, it might have been me suggesting Max would have the
most clues for fixing this one :)

In any case, Greg Edwards @ SGI said this morning he will
take a look at it - some more rpm-macros massaging needed.

-- Mark

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>