pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp update - improved pmlogger_daily tracing

To: markgw@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp update - improved pmlogger_daily tracing
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:28:00 +1100
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <498F7B10.4000007@xxxxxxx>
References: <1234035930.13724.21.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <498F7B10.4000007@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Not sure what happened there ... it was committed locally, and I thought
I had pushed back to my tree on oss.sgi.com, but apparently not.

I think it is there now, so please try and pull again.

Thanks.


On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 11:38 +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote:
> 
> Ken McDonell wrote:
> > Changes committed to git://oss.sgi.com/kenj/pcp.git dev
> > 
> >  man/man1/pmlogger_daily.1      |   20 ++++++++++++++
> >  src/pmlogctl/pmlogger_daily.sh |   58 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > commit 33c1eb38d3e295817f785d99bfe9c06b0936c09a
> > Author: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Sun Feb 8 06:38:16 2009 +1100
> > 
> >     Add -t want option
> >     
> >     Most useful for situations where pmlogger_daily fails, but only 
> > sometimes.
> >     This option turns on very verbose tracing (-VV) and captures the trace
> >     output in the file $PCP_LOG_DIR/daily.<dateandtimestamp>.trace and keeps
> >     the trace file for "want" days.
> 
> Ken, are you sure this was really committed? I just pulled from your tree
> and the above commit doesn't show up??
> 
> Cheers

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>