pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions

To: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions
From: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:10:19 +1100
Cc: "pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1233714153.4305.58.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: SGI Engineering
References: <1233627045.5518.55.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1233692872.25245.43.camel@bozo> <1233704423.4305.34.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4988DDD9.5020101@xxxxxxx> <1233707396.4305.49.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4988EDFF.1080506@xxxxxxx> <1233714153.4305.58.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: markgw@xxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)


Nathan Scott wrote:
OK done, bare and group 'pcp' writable: git://oss.sgi.com/pcp/pcp-gui.git
or for easier pushing, use: git+ssh://oss.sgi.com/oss/git/pcp/pcp-gui.git

I left the default branch named 'master' rather than renaming it
to 'dev' like we have in the pcp tree. Let me know what you'd rather.

May as well be consistent - can you make it dev?  There should
be (already) a stable tree there also... did that survive the
cloning process?

renamed 'master' to 'dev'. 'stable' survived the clone and is fine.

Oh, also be a good idea to check with Russell/Eric cos I think
its a manual process now to get things visible to gitweb?

yep, I'll ping Rus to run his gitweb thingy.

Cheers

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>