| To: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions |
| From: | Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:10:19 +1100 |
| Cc: | "pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1233714153.4305.58.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | SGI Engineering |
| References: | <1233627045.5518.55.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1233692872.25245.43.camel@bozo> <1233704423.4305.34.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4988DDD9.5020101@xxxxxxx> <1233707396.4305.49.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4988EDFF.1080506@xxxxxxx> <1233714153.4305.58.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | markgw@xxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) |
Nathan Scott wrote: OK done, bare and group 'pcp' writable: git://oss.sgi.com/pcp/pcp-gui.git or for easier pushing, use: git+ssh://oss.sgi.com/oss/git/pcp/pcp-gui.git I left the default branch named 'master' rather than renaming it to 'dev' like we have in the pcp tree. Let me know what you'd rather.May as well be consistent - can you make it dev? There should be (already) a stable tree there also... did that survive the cloning process? renamed 'master' to 'dev'. 'stable' survived the clone and is fine. Oh, also be a good idea to check with Russell/Eric cos I think its a manual process now to get things visible to gitweb? yep, I'll ping Rus to run his gitweb thingy. Cheers |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions, Max Matveev |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions, Max Matveev |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |