pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions

To: markgw@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions
From: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:22:33 +1100
Cc: "pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4988EDFF.1080506@xxxxxxx>
References: <1233627045.5518.55.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1233692872.25245.43.camel@bozo> <1233704423.4305.34.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4988DDD9.5020101@xxxxxxx> <1233707396.4305.49.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4988EDFF.1080506@xxxxxxx>
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 12:23 +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote:
> 
> Nathan Scott wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:14 +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote:
> > ...
> > There's some new content (started on the online man pages, added
> > some docs about PCP GUI package).  I like it, Martin likes it -
> > lemme know your opinion:
> >
> >     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/revamp/
> 
> looks good to me. The list subscription instructions need to
> be updated since Rus changed over to mailman. The new instructions
> should say somrthing like: To subscribe to the PCP mailing list,
> use the web interface at http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/pcp

Done.

> OK done, bare and group 'pcp' writable: git://oss.sgi.com/pcp/pcp-gui.git
> or for easier pushing, use: git+ssh://oss.sgi.com/oss/git/pcp/pcp-gui.git
> 
> I left the default branch named 'master' rather than renaming it
> to 'dev' like we have in the pcp tree. Let me know what you'd rather.

May as well be consistent - can you make it dev?  There should
be (already) a stable tree there also... did that survive the
cloning process?

Oh, also be a good idea to check with Russell/Eric cos I think
its a manual process now to get things visible to gitweb?

thanks.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>