| To: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pmprobe and archive offset fetch |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:04:20 +1100 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1233029678.4460.57.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1233029678.4460.57.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
No good reason I can think of. pmprobe (and pminfo) are "one shot" tools, so -O makes sense ... -S is synonymous with -O and -T makes no sense. So pmprobe should probably be like pminfo with -O supported and neither of -S or -T allowed. On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 15:14 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone remember if there was a specific reason why pmprobe doesn't > accept the -O (offset) option? > > thanks! > > -- > Nathan > > _______________________________________________ > pcp mailing list > pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/pcp |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | pmprobe and archive offset fetch, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] pmprobe and archive offset fetch, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | pmprobe and archive offset fetch, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pmprobe and archive offset fetch, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |