| To: | kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:03:04 +1100 |
| Cc: | markgw@xxxxxxx, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1232752194.7851.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1232744789.7851.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <497A3E33.60201@xxxxxxx> <1232752194.7851.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 10:09 +1100, Ken McDonell wrote: > The classical C compiler had no notion of "read-only" data, so by some > time scale this is a "recent" invention ... 8^)> > > But gcc has been doing this for sometime, so I'm guessing it has been > broken for a long time. There is no QA coverage for this and I only > stumbled on in when I was playing with some C code coverage tools. It works for me - used this functionality a couple of days ago (pmval launched from kmchart via the metric info dialog)... so somehow it was managing to work. Theres interactive QA in the kmchart suite for it... nothing automated though, which would be much better. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates, Mark Goodwin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pmprobe and archive offset fetch, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates, Mark Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | pcp updates, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |