pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Daylight savings bug - fix for pmdumplog -v

To: markgw@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] Daylight savings bug - fix for pmdumplog -v
From: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:48:12 +1100
Cc: kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <492B56FB.40604@xxxxxxx>
References: <1223438632.4494.17.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1227549185.10096.13.camel@bozo> <1227566299.4557.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1227571952.10096.34.camel@bozo> <1227573397.4557.34.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <492B56FB.40604@xxxxxxx>
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 12:38 +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 11:12 +1100, Ken McDonell wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 09:38 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Probably best if you re-activate your account on oss.sgi.com,
> > unless you have a local server you can use for exporting your
> > git tree to the world?
> 
> You can just post the patch to the list for review if you want, and
> if accepted, Jonathan will push it back out to the 'dev' branch at
> git://oss.sgi.com/pcp/pcp.git

For someone working regularly, this model ends up pushing
alot of extra work onto other individuals, instead of
spreading the load - this is happening already with just
Jonathan & I regularly doing git work (eg. domain numbers,
pcpweb updates, etc) ... it would be better for someone
with Kens background to be using git too IMO.

> I can get oss accounts created if needed, but I'm wondering if
> we could maybe have a semi-open-access 'incoming' repository or
> something for those without a net visible server ..? Or will simply
> mailing patches to pcp@oss suffice?

For most people I think that'd be fine, but for someone
with lots of history & high levels of trust from everyone
working on PCP already, it'd be better to go the git route.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>